05-05-2010, 01:37 AM
Since I have many publications, I am puzzled that one chapter from a book with thirty--http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/ --should be your only source about my views on the assassination. I discuss JFK on at least three web sites, http://assassinationscience.com, http://assassinationresearch.com and my blog at http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com. When there is more than one sufficient cause of an event, the situation is known as one of "over-determination". I certainly agree that Israel has been the prime offender with regard to the development of atomic weapons and needs to be brought under international control. That, however, is not the same thing as having proof that Israel was involved in the assassination of JFK and that hypothesis is not necessary to explain it, which is an example of "Occam's Razor". Israel could have motive without having participated, even if it was an outcome it preferred, which appears to have been the case here. You could write to the twenty-nine other contributors to the same book and find out if they do or do not agree.