05-05-2010, 12:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-05-2010, 01:02 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
Listen,
My research (often based upon that of others who have gone before me) has established (a) that there are at least fifteen indications of Secret Service complicity in setting him up for the hit, (b) that the CIA/military/mafia were involved in taking him out, © that the FBI was used to cover it up, (d) that J. Edgar and Lyndon were principals, and (e) with financing from wealthy Texas oil men. I can prove my allegations. You appear to be willing to infer from Ruby's ethnicity to Israeli control and to make other speculative inferences that I am unwilling to adopt. My only advantages in dealing with these issues are (i) that I have been working with the best qualified individuals to ever study the case, (ii) that we have reconstructed the case from the bottom up, and (iii) that I had the benefit of 35 years teaching logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning as background in evaluating arguments and evidence. There were more than sufficient parties who wanted to kill him without a stretch to Tel Aviv. You are welcome to your opinions. Show some respect for those of others.
Jim
My research (often based upon that of others who have gone before me) has established (a) that there are at least fifteen indications of Secret Service complicity in setting him up for the hit, (b) that the CIA/military/mafia were involved in taking him out, © that the FBI was used to cover it up, (d) that J. Edgar and Lyndon were principals, and (e) with financing from wealthy Texas oil men. I can prove my allegations. You appear to be willing to infer from Ruby's ethnicity to Israeli control and to make other speculative inferences that I am unwilling to adopt. My only advantages in dealing with these issues are (i) that I have been working with the best qualified individuals to ever study the case, (ii) that we have reconstructed the case from the bottom up, and (iii) that I had the benefit of 35 years teaching logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning as background in evaluating arguments and evidence. There were more than sufficient parties who wanted to kill him without a stretch to Tel Aviv. You are welcome to your opinions. Show some respect for those of others.
Jim
Mark Stapleton Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:It was a red-blooded American affair and the Mossad never had the chance.
Mr. Fetzer,
I know Bob Ringler addressed this thread to you, but since he seems to be absent at present, allow me to make the observation that my research has convinced me that quite the opposite is the case. JFK's death was a red blooded Zionist affair and America never stood a chance.
Perhaps we differ on the definition of 'American'.
For example, Jack Ruby was technically an 'American' but his primary loyalty was to Zionist Israel, for whom he sacrificed his liberty.
James Angleton was technically an American but his time heading the Israel desk at the CIA was spent serving Israel's interests. His refusal to share information relating to the Dimona project enabled the project to escape America's notice in the critical first three years.
In December 1960, shortly after the discovery of Dimona by the US authorities, the US Intelligence Board asked the Joint Atomic Energy Intelligence Committee ''to prepare a detailed postmortem on why the intelligence community did not recognise this development (Dimona) earlier'. The study concluded that 'information was available to some elements of the intelligence community as early as April 1958 that could have alerted the atomic energy intelligence community to Israeli intentions'. (Cohen, p.84)
LBJ was technically an American President, but analysis of his actions reveals a loyalty to Israel above that of any loyalty to America. I don't need to go into detail here but the USS Liberty incident is just one example of this.
I think you will find that the JFK case is littered with players like this. All you need to do is look.