16-12-2008, 04:36 PM
Nathaniel Heidenheimer Wrote:Agreed that we are no threat, but there are examples of individuals who have been perceived as such.
Part of what constitutes the threat, is how the information is communicated.
It it simply stays in isolated "silos" of information then it is less dangerous, even if there are a lot of important revelations contained in the silos.
Just step sideways--i.e. connect sites like this one to others using headlines that connect the dots in terms of relevance and legitimation for a targetted audience-- that could be seen as dangerous.
Of course it is also possible that I am trying to leverage my McIdentity one tough internet hombre, not that such points need belaboring!
Jim Garrison posed such a threat. And CD is completely right here, his persistance by writing "On The Trial.." the book that became the film caused several things to occur. A new generation became aware of this official lie. A demand for documents lead to the AARB, which lead to millions of pages being released and that "movement" paved the way for journalists like David Talbot and Jeff Morley. So, there has been some movement. There have been people who have been threats. (Look at what they are doing to Cyril Wecht).
And yes the universe so arcs.
Dawn
ps An old friend of mine who was deeply interested in all things conspiracy just wrote me that he now no longer has the time. You MAKE the time. If justice is not a priority then there is no hope.


