16-12-2008, 04:15 PM
Agreed that we are no threat, but there are examples of individuals who have been perceived as such.
Part of what constitutes the threat, is how the information is communicated.
It it simply stays in isolated "silos" of information then it is less dangerous, even if there are a lot of important revelations contained in the silos.
Just step sideways--i.e. connect sites like this one to others using headlines that connect the dots in terms of relevance and legitimation for a targetted audience-- that could be seen as dangerous.
Of course it is also possible that I am trying to leverage my McIdentity one tough internet hombre, not that such points need belaboring!
Part of what constitutes the threat, is how the information is communicated.
It it simply stays in isolated "silos" of information then it is less dangerous, even if there are a lot of important revelations contained in the silos.
Just step sideways--i.e. connect sites like this one to others using headlines that connect the dots in terms of relevance and legitimation for a targetted audience-- that could be seen as dangerous.
Of course it is also possible that I am trying to leverage my McIdentity one tough internet hombre, not that such points need belaboring!