13-02-2010, 02:07 PM
Time and time again I find myself simply lost for words.
Remove references to Israel and the IDF, substitute them with any other country and militia ('Defence Force') and most people would simply burst out laughing at the way that reads - the sheer in-your-face absurdity of it.
But we can't have anyone suggesting that prima fascia evidence of serious criminal behaviour by the self-styled 'most moral army in the world' be investigated to prove it wrong now can we?
As for ANY of the main political parties in this country; there is nary a fag-paper between them when it comes to the epoch-defining issues of the age. The name of the game is 'distract and divide the Sheeple with domestic trivia and keep them in fear of that dreadful scary terrorist threat, whilst the real agenda is pursued out of sight and out of mind. The leadership of any party with serious aspirations to 'governing' needs to be either already complicit (Cameron/Brown) or sufficiently wet behind the ears to be readily susceptible to those 'offers which cannot be refused' that our esteemed SIS's, their masters and gophers are so well practiced at making.
Until the system itself collapses or is collapsed my vote will always go to 'None of the above' - on principle. I know it will have bugger-all effect - and the galling thing is 'THEY' KNOW IT. But I do it anyway
Remove references to Israel and the IDF, substitute them with any other country and militia ('Defence Force') and most people would simply burst out laughing at the way that reads - the sheer in-your-face absurdity of it.
But we can't have anyone suggesting that prima fascia evidence of serious criminal behaviour by the self-styled 'most moral army in the world' be investigated to prove it wrong now can we?
As for ANY of the main political parties in this country; there is nary a fag-paper between them when it comes to the epoch-defining issues of the age. The name of the game is 'distract and divide the Sheeple with domestic trivia and keep them in fear of that dreadful scary terrorist threat, whilst the real agenda is pursued out of sight and out of mind. The leadership of any party with serious aspirations to 'governing' needs to be either already complicit (Cameron/Brown) or sufficiently wet behind the ears to be readily susceptible to those 'offers which cannot be refused' that our esteemed SIS's, their masters and gophers are so well practiced at making.
Until the system itself collapses or is collapsed my vote will always go to 'None of the above' - on principle. I know it will have bugger-all effect - and the galling thing is 'THEY' KNOW IT. But I do it anyway
Peter Presland
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]