12-01-2010, 08:50 PM
If Otepka did initiate the October 1960 request to CIA and MI for details of which defectors to the USSR were double agents or, in other words, "false defectors", then it would be important to establish a motive for such behaviour. On the face of it, a man in Otepka's position would surely not have expected truthful and honest answers to his questions. And he would also presumably not have expected CIA or MI, let alone someone as inherently paranoid as Angleton, to identify double agents to him.
The defection of Oswald to the USSR, and his untroubled return, with KBG-affiliated bride, to the USA prove, beyond any doubt, that Oswald had handlers with the power to allow a "traitor" and "national security threat" to waltz straight back into America.
For me, this leads to the following fundamental questions about Lee Harvey Oswald:
Who was handling Oswald at the time of his defection?
Who was handling Oswald during his and his KGB-affliated wife's miraculously easy, and therefore greased, return to such as the White Russian community in the US and the Paines?
Was the group that assassinated Kennedy the same as that which was handling him during his defection and return?
Or did another group plotting to assassinate JFK learn the identity of Oswald's handlers?
If the latter, did this group learn that Oswald's defection and return had been handled by an element of American intelligence - eg CIA, ONI, MI? And did this group therefore deliberately add to Oswald's intelligence legend and select him as the patsy for the assassination of Kennedy? A patsy whose background would have to be covered up by his original handlers to save their, and their institution's, very existence?
Plus the wildcard.
Was Oswald an MK-ULTRA test subject in Atsugi?
In fact, was Oswald an MK-ULTRA test subject from childhood, as per an interpretation of the Harvey and Lee hypothesis?
The defection of Oswald to the USSR, and his untroubled return, with KBG-affiliated bride, to the USA prove, beyond any doubt, that Oswald had handlers with the power to allow a "traitor" and "national security threat" to waltz straight back into America.
For me, this leads to the following fundamental questions about Lee Harvey Oswald:
Who was handling Oswald at the time of his defection?
Who was handling Oswald during his and his KGB-affliated wife's miraculously easy, and therefore greased, return to such as the White Russian community in the US and the Paines?
Was the group that assassinated Kennedy the same as that which was handling him during his defection and return?
Or did another group plotting to assassinate JFK learn the identity of Oswald's handlers?
If the latter, did this group learn that Oswald's defection and return had been handled by an element of American intelligence - eg CIA, ONI, MI? And did this group therefore deliberately add to Oswald's intelligence legend and select him as the patsy for the assassination of Kennedy? A patsy whose background would have to be covered up by his original handlers to save their, and their institution's, very existence?
Plus the wildcard.
Was Oswald an MK-ULTRA test subject in Atsugi?
In fact, was Oswald an MK-ULTRA test subject from childhood, as per an interpretation of the Harvey and Lee hypothesis?
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war