11-05-2023, 05:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2023, 06:55 PM by Brian Doyle.)
Andrej Stancak has attempted to answer my Altgens/Wiegman challenge on his "JFKTruthMatters" blog...Typical of Stancak he does so on a remote website no one knows about with no attempt to post it where it will be noticed (The Education Forum)...
Andrej is ignoring my proof and sticking to his bogus claim that the partial face seen in between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens is indeed Sarah Stanton...Stancak is doing this because he is trying to place Stanton somewhere other than Prayer Man...If Stanton is the tiny face then she can't be Prayer Man...If you take the time to endure Andrej's lengthy pseudo-analysis in the attached link you will understand his case...
However, as Andrej manages to do every time, he once again refutes himself and proves my case that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...
Please observe Andrej's "Figure 4" photo evidence in his article and take notice of his locating and identifying the synchronized frames between Altgens 6 and Wiegman...This part of his research is correct and can be seen as being so by the naked eye because the people in the images are in the exact same positions in both photos...Altgens 6 is equal to Wiegman Z256 or so...
If you review Stancak's case he attempts to justify his claim that Stanton is the little face in between Lovelady & Shelley by drawing an outline over what he claims is the faint image of Stanton in the shadows between Lovelady & Shelley...
I'm presenting this evidence as a skill test to see if anyone else can figure-out the fatal mistake Stancak has made in his lengthy analysis here...The dysfunctional research community, that is run by James Gordon, has created a situation where I cannot bring this to the attention of the Education Forum where I could prove my credibility and quickly dispatch Stancak and his Prayer Man rubbish in short order...Gordon has succeeded in making skilled debate, like that I offer, a site rules offense and treats brilliant argument as if it was a rules violation that needed to be quickly gotten off the board...Because of this backwards moderation the place where my final demolishing of the Prayer Man theory needs to be shown will never host this definitive proof...
I'm posting this in the hope that someone else will see the fatal mistake Stancak made and how it disproves ten years of his pseudo-analysis in one move...This is indeed a good example of how contradicting proof was ignored in the formulating of the Prayer Man theory...Oh, by the way...The partial face in between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens 6 is Pauline Sanders...Altgens' telephoto lens makes it look like she is in between Lovelady & Shelley when she is actually well behind them and against the glass to the east side of the door:
https://thejfktruthmatters.wordpress.com/
Andrej is ignoring my proof and sticking to his bogus claim that the partial face seen in between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens is indeed Sarah Stanton...Stancak is doing this because he is trying to place Stanton somewhere other than Prayer Man...If Stanton is the tiny face then she can't be Prayer Man...If you take the time to endure Andrej's lengthy pseudo-analysis in the attached link you will understand his case...
However, as Andrej manages to do every time, he once again refutes himself and proves my case that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...
Please observe Andrej's "Figure 4" photo evidence in his article and take notice of his locating and identifying the synchronized frames between Altgens 6 and Wiegman...This part of his research is correct and can be seen as being so by the naked eye because the people in the images are in the exact same positions in both photos...Altgens 6 is equal to Wiegman Z256 or so...
If you review Stancak's case he attempts to justify his claim that Stanton is the little face in between Lovelady & Shelley by drawing an outline over what he claims is the faint image of Stanton in the shadows between Lovelady & Shelley...
I'm presenting this evidence as a skill test to see if anyone else can figure-out the fatal mistake Stancak has made in his lengthy analysis here...The dysfunctional research community, that is run by James Gordon, has created a situation where I cannot bring this to the attention of the Education Forum where I could prove my credibility and quickly dispatch Stancak and his Prayer Man rubbish in short order...Gordon has succeeded in making skilled debate, like that I offer, a site rules offense and treats brilliant argument as if it was a rules violation that needed to be quickly gotten off the board...Because of this backwards moderation the place where my final demolishing of the Prayer Man theory needs to be shown will never host this definitive proof...
I'm posting this in the hope that someone else will see the fatal mistake Stancak made and how it disproves ten years of his pseudo-analysis in one move...This is indeed a good example of how contradicting proof was ignored in the formulating of the Prayer Man theory...Oh, by the way...The partial face in between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens 6 is Pauline Sanders...Altgens' telephoto lens makes it look like she is in between Lovelady & Shelley when she is actually well behind them and against the glass to the east side of the door:
https://thejfktruthmatters.wordpress.com/