25-10-2019, 02:37 PM
The Secret Gold Treaty ---- continuing:
The many, many gold certificates that Peter Johnson gave me copies of and was also trying to negotiate on behalf of Dr. Edison Damanik, all bore owner names that were well known VIP's such as the USA's James Baker III, East Germany's Erich Honecker, Egypt's Hosni Mubarak and Ireland's Patrick Hillery, the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat - plus dozens of other high profile individuals - were almost all misspelled or mis-titled - such as "Mrs." Queen Elizabeth II. The spelling mistakes were sufficient to cause immediate suspicion and usually meant that the certificate in question were written off as poor fakes. The unlikely names of such famous people added an additional layer of deniability. Were any of these people directly contacted - as was Dr, Patrick Hillery - asking ab out his ownership, they could, with hand on heart deny ownership.
The mechanism was set out in the below letter that Peter Johnson copied me with and details the mechanism that the so called "heritage documents" bore. Each certificate set could easily run to 70 or 80 pages of double sided printed information that was, at first glance, dizzying and bewildering in its complexity. Each bore numerous code numbers and names.
I was once told by someone who was knowledgeable on these matters that that the complex information on each certificate was rendered clear by use of a Cardano Grille, a cryptogrpahic device to cloak messages that was invented by Frenchman, Jerome Cardan. I have no idea is this was true but if one were to see any of these certificates close up it certainly seemed a feasible explanation.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=9776&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9776&stc=1)
We see that the Heritage Document reveals that the "named party" on the main certificate is actually not the beneficial owner but is a so called "painted face" acting as a cut out on behalf of the real owner. Doubtless the named party was handsomely rewarded for their role play.
The foregoing is just to explain the complexity and cunningness that formed part of this story.
I now wish to to turn to the Project Hammer story which explains how such staggeringly vast sums of AU bullion plundered by the Golden Lily teams could not be absorbed into the gold market without destroying the price of gold bullion. Some quantities could be absorbed over many decades, and were. But in the main the bullion sat in various banks around the world and were simply used as collateral in so called Collateral Trading Programmes or High Yield Investment Programmes - which in fact was another deniable mechanism (and denied they were), but one that enabled value to be drawn from the underlying collateral.
The investigation of Collateral Trading also took me many years of hard digging to understand and verify. The break through came when I was given a copy of General Erle Cocke's de facto death-bed confession in the form of a deposition he gave a few weeks before he died of Pancreatic cancer. A second breakthrough came when I was sent a batch of documents from US lawyer, Jonathan Levy, that related to his class action lawsuit against the Vatican Bank (Alperin v Vatican Bank) fo laundering gold bullion of the Ustasha treasury that was plundered by Croatian fascist, Ante Pavelic, a puppet of Adolf Hitler at the end of WWII.
At Johnathan's request I acted as an expert witness in that law case in order to rebut a claim made by the Vatican lawyer, Franzo Grande Stevens, (who was the Agnelli family lawyer). As I recall, Grande Stevens claimed that the Vatican Bank only kept its records for 10 years, which I understood to be an argument to convince the court in the negative concerning approval for a far reaching discovery process. But wait! How could the Vatican Bank, which was responsible for paying the pensions of retired priests only keep its records for ten years? Do all priests die before the ten year period is up thereby meaning there is no need to keep addresses and make monthly payments to them? It seemed a wholly unjustifiable argument. I also rebutted on the basis that banks are required by law to keep their records for decades, often for 70 years or more and sometimes in perpetuity. For me, Grande Stevens argument just didn't play.
The Vatican became so concerned that Levy's lawsuit would force full disclosure of their files that they turned to the US State Department who as I was told instructed the Judge to dismiss the trial for reasons of sovereign immunity.
Anyway turning back to the second breakthrough I mentioned above; this was a letter from the Vatican to the US Treasury requesting permission to join a High Yield Programme. It was there in black and white. Bingo!
The many, many gold certificates that Peter Johnson gave me copies of and was also trying to negotiate on behalf of Dr. Edison Damanik, all bore owner names that were well known VIP's such as the USA's James Baker III, East Germany's Erich Honecker, Egypt's Hosni Mubarak and Ireland's Patrick Hillery, the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat - plus dozens of other high profile individuals - were almost all misspelled or mis-titled - such as "Mrs." Queen Elizabeth II. The spelling mistakes were sufficient to cause immediate suspicion and usually meant that the certificate in question were written off as poor fakes. The unlikely names of such famous people added an additional layer of deniability. Were any of these people directly contacted - as was Dr, Patrick Hillery - asking ab out his ownership, they could, with hand on heart deny ownership.
The mechanism was set out in the below letter that Peter Johnson copied me with and details the mechanism that the so called "heritage documents" bore. Each certificate set could easily run to 70 or 80 pages of double sided printed information that was, at first glance, dizzying and bewildering in its complexity. Each bore numerous code numbers and names.
I was once told by someone who was knowledgeable on these matters that that the complex information on each certificate was rendered clear by use of a Cardano Grille, a cryptogrpahic device to cloak messages that was invented by Frenchman, Jerome Cardan. I have no idea is this was true but if one were to see any of these certificates close up it certainly seemed a feasible explanation.
We see that the Heritage Document reveals that the "named party" on the main certificate is actually not the beneficial owner but is a so called "painted face" acting as a cut out on behalf of the real owner. Doubtless the named party was handsomely rewarded for their role play.
The foregoing is just to explain the complexity and cunningness that formed part of this story.
I now wish to to turn to the Project Hammer story which explains how such staggeringly vast sums of AU bullion plundered by the Golden Lily teams could not be absorbed into the gold market without destroying the price of gold bullion. Some quantities could be absorbed over many decades, and were. But in the main the bullion sat in various banks around the world and were simply used as collateral in so called Collateral Trading Programmes or High Yield Investment Programmes - which in fact was another deniable mechanism (and denied they were), but one that enabled value to be drawn from the underlying collateral.
The investigation of Collateral Trading also took me many years of hard digging to understand and verify. The break through came when I was given a copy of General Erle Cocke's de facto death-bed confession in the form of a deposition he gave a few weeks before he died of Pancreatic cancer. A second breakthrough came when I was sent a batch of documents from US lawyer, Jonathan Levy, that related to his class action lawsuit against the Vatican Bank (Alperin v Vatican Bank) fo laundering gold bullion of the Ustasha treasury that was plundered by Croatian fascist, Ante Pavelic, a puppet of Adolf Hitler at the end of WWII.
At Johnathan's request I acted as an expert witness in that law case in order to rebut a claim made by the Vatican lawyer, Franzo Grande Stevens, (who was the Agnelli family lawyer). As I recall, Grande Stevens claimed that the Vatican Bank only kept its records for 10 years, which I understood to be an argument to convince the court in the negative concerning approval for a far reaching discovery process. But wait! How could the Vatican Bank, which was responsible for paying the pensions of retired priests only keep its records for ten years? Do all priests die before the ten year period is up thereby meaning there is no need to keep addresses and make monthly payments to them? It seemed a wholly unjustifiable argument. I also rebutted on the basis that banks are required by law to keep their records for decades, often for 70 years or more and sometimes in perpetuity. For me, Grande Stevens argument just didn't play.
The Vatican became so concerned that Levy's lawsuit would force full disclosure of their files that they turned to the US State Department who as I was told instructed the Judge to dismiss the trial for reasons of sovereign immunity.
Anyway turning back to the second breakthrough I mentioned above; this was a letter from the Vatican to the US Treasury requesting permission to join a High Yield Programme. It was there in black and white. Bingo!
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14