10-07-2019, 08:44 PM
"Adams is a really good witness for our side." What is "our side"? Is this implication that there are two sides and one of the sides is that Oswald was the lone gunman?
If this is the concept, then IMHO those who give credit to the "lone gunman" theory as being one of the sides is actually helping in the 56 year-old-cover-up.
Just because the mainstream media is still lying about the assassination doesn't mean one gives dignity to the lone gunman theory as a "side" of an argument, etc. IHMO.
That isn't a "side" to an argument since honest people should only be dealing in the truth. There are legitimate "sides" regarding the assassination, but they are such theories as (1) ex-Nazis did it vs (2) Southern segregationists did it. Apparently Don Adams is in the camp of blaming Joseph Milteer and Segregationists, Minutemen, and a complicit secret service.
But to present the JFK assassination argument as (1) Oswald did it alone vs (2) two or more people did it is to ignore all the research of 56 years (and to actually help the liars).
The lone gunmen theorists are not arguing, THEY ARE LYING. They shouldn't be given the dignity of being a side to any argument. Lies do not qualify as argument IMHO. They are lies, period.
James Lateer
If this is the concept, then IMHO those who give credit to the "lone gunman" theory as being one of the sides is actually helping in the 56 year-old-cover-up.
Just because the mainstream media is still lying about the assassination doesn't mean one gives dignity to the lone gunman theory as a "side" of an argument, etc. IHMO.
That isn't a "side" to an argument since honest people should only be dealing in the truth. There are legitimate "sides" regarding the assassination, but they are such theories as (1) ex-Nazis did it vs (2) Southern segregationists did it. Apparently Don Adams is in the camp of blaming Joseph Milteer and Segregationists, Minutemen, and a complicit secret service.
But to present the JFK assassination argument as (1) Oswald did it alone vs (2) two or more people did it is to ignore all the research of 56 years (and to actually help the liars).
The lone gunmen theorists are not arguing, THEY ARE LYING. They shouldn't be given the dignity of being a side to any argument. Lies do not qualify as argument IMHO. They are lies, period.
James Lateer