16-04-2018, 08:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-04-2018, 10:58 PM by David Andrews.)
Why does the cover story require a stolen nuclear missile, when no proportional damage occurred in PENTBOM? A stolen conventional Russian weapon wouldn't do, or couldn't be traced to Bout?
Should we believe that a Granit missile warhead allegedly X-times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb caused no greater structural damage at the Pentagon?
Also, the idea (in the Khalezov interview) that the Granit missile's guidance system chose the Pentagon as the most important target in DC among several options works against the well-known structural, propaganda and psyops preparation for PENTBOM, which I shouldn't need to recite here.
Finally, Khalezov's adoption by the Fetzer-ized Veterans Today site brings a whiff of disinfo to the whole proceedings.
Should we believe that a Granit missile warhead allegedly X-times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb caused no greater structural damage at the Pentagon?
Also, the idea (in the Khalezov interview) that the Granit missile's guidance system chose the Pentagon as the most important target in DC among several options works against the well-known structural, propaganda and psyops preparation for PENTBOM, which I shouldn't need to recite here.
Finally, Khalezov's adoption by the Fetzer-ized Veterans Today site brings a whiff of disinfo to the whole proceedings.