Las Vegas Terror Murders

[Peter Lemkin]

Multiple reports of multiple shooters from multiple locations. Hushed up.

Interesting and believable - but fatally flawed. Both the questioner and the interviewee know, but do NOTHING to TELL those listening the MOST important possible piece of information, i.e. the physical distance and relationship of the hotel she was in and the hotel the official story was about! I have spent a lot of time trying to find this out and they seem to be quite a long distance away, as my first thoughts were they heard the shots because the two hotels were near. The fact, however, they never mention this, but assume the listener would know [even as an American I hate L.V. and have never 'stopped' there except for gas to keep on driving the **** out of that hellhole]. This is different than the different floors stories and goes into the different hotel area story - but I don't see how such a mass event could be covered up. This woman seems believable, but I'd like to hear a few other people at the same hotel too to confirm, as there seem not to have been victims in other places than the concert and that was not near to this hotel. Not saying it isn't so, but this kind of interview is a raw story that needs work to become research information. The other question is why would authorities try to mask multiple gunmen or multiple locations - especially one so far from the official location? These two hotels are at least 2.5 miles away from each other....hard to imagine the shots would be heard from one to the other even in the desert air.