02-08-2017, 07:51 PM
Yes, it is @ censorship. An apt description, Mr. DiEugenio.
Guilty of the same @ The Warren Commission, who essentially silenced anyone--no matter how pertinent their information was to unraveling the plain simple truth in this case.
Whether it's a multi-paneled commission body or an author with a biased slant, ahem @ Baer, etc. tilting an outcome is not indicative of promoting truth. It's very telling that some people come out of the woodwork to engage in these less than honourable tactics. Why? The answer is obvious.
Thank goodness for the Bleau's, the DiEugenio's, the Newman's, etc. to help set the record straight.
Sadly, as his handlers moved him around the grand chess board of deception, the wrongfully accused was left holding the bag of their most daring caper (the illegal power grab from a democratically elected leader of a once free Republic).
Guilty of the same @ The Warren Commission, who essentially silenced anyone--no matter how pertinent their information was to unraveling the plain simple truth in this case.
Whether it's a multi-paneled commission body or an author with a biased slant, ahem @ Baer, etc. tilting an outcome is not indicative of promoting truth. It's very telling that some people come out of the woodwork to engage in these less than honourable tactics. Why? The answer is obvious.
Thank goodness for the Bleau's, the DiEugenio's, the Newman's, etc. to help set the record straight.
Sadly, as his handlers moved him around the grand chess board of deception, the wrongfully accused was left holding the bag of their most daring caper (the illegal power grab from a democratically elected leader of a once free Republic).