19-02-2017, 10:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-02-2017, 11:28 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
I get this question a lot, so I thought I would address it openly, and to everyone. "Scott, what makes you think the photographs your father had, didn't have anything to do with Watergate?"
1. My father was the sixth burglar, so, he would be implicating himself too if the photos had anything to do with Watergate.
2. My father showed them to Richard Poyle, and many others. He showed them to Poyle as if to say he knew, and he wanted to interview Poyle, take his information down and record it, my father knew Poyle was in Mexico the day before Kennedy's assassination.
3. My father was showing these photos around Miami in 1973-74, Watergate was already over with, Frank was in Jail, so showing these photos around in Miami would not affect the outcome of Watergate, if those photos had anything to do with Watergate, it was over.
4. Only a hand full of folks knew what those photos represented, and what they were of, and I have no doubt whatsoever, my father had the only known photographs of some of the men involved in Kennedy's assassination.
1. My father was the sixth burglar, so, he would be implicating himself too if the photos had anything to do with Watergate.
2. My father showed them to Richard Poyle, and many others. He showed them to Poyle as if to say he knew, and he wanted to interview Poyle, take his information down and record it, my father knew Poyle was in Mexico the day before Kennedy's assassination.
3. My father was showing these photos around Miami in 1973-74, Watergate was already over with, Frank was in Jail, so showing these photos around in Miami would not affect the outcome of Watergate, if those photos had anything to do with Watergate, it was over.
4. Only a hand full of folks knew what those photos represented, and what they were of, and I have no doubt whatsoever, my father had the only known photographs of some of the men involved in Kennedy's assassination.