29-12-2016, 08:11 PM
I really wanted to express that I'm not the asshole, arrogant SOB some folks believe me to be.
AND,
I'm not a quitter, I will call out folks like Micheal Best who did what he did then he tries to turn it around to make me look bad.
I'm not out to prove anyone wrong I just want to provide the facts, and if these facts which are presented in a light like never before one has to ask themself, could Scott Kaiser be right about Watergate or JFK?
To date, no one has challenged my findings other then to accuse me of plagiarizing. Again, one has to ask themself could Scott Kaiser be right?
There's no doubt of a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and there's no doubt Oswald was a pasty, in-fact, several great authors have dissected the autopsy reports as well as the X-ray films which this "Best Eveidence" proves Oswald's ininnocence. These are very important pieces of evidence to prove a conspiracy.
With having all this information at hand someone needs to fill in the blanks as to who was involved, after all, "someone would have talked."
Imagine, what (if) Scott Kaiser is right, just how would this effect the entire outcome?
Peace!
AND,
I'm not a quitter, I will call out folks like Micheal Best who did what he did then he tries to turn it around to make me look bad.
I'm not out to prove anyone wrong I just want to provide the facts, and if these facts which are presented in a light like never before one has to ask themself, could Scott Kaiser be right about Watergate or JFK?
To date, no one has challenged my findings other then to accuse me of plagiarizing. Again, one has to ask themself could Scott Kaiser be right?
There's no doubt of a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and there's no doubt Oswald was a pasty, in-fact, several great authors have dissected the autopsy reports as well as the X-ray films which this "Best Eveidence" proves Oswald's ininnocence. These are very important pieces of evidence to prove a conspiracy.
With having all this information at hand someone needs to fill in the blanks as to who was involved, after all, "someone would have talked."
Imagine, what (if) Scott Kaiser is right, just how would this effect the entire outcome?
Peace!

