16-05-2016, 03:23 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:I always love the line [true by the way] that 15 of the 19 'hijackers' [not true by the way - patsy hijackers would be more to the truth] were Saudi. Then, the question SHOULD be why did the USA not immediately attack S.A. instead of the pre-planed Iraq and Afghanistan? While the 28 pages no doubt make S.A. look bad, as they should, it really leads ultimately to US foreknowledge and complicity - before/during/after and THAT is more damning by light-years than that S.A. [and Pakistan and Israel and others] played minor parts in the affair of 9-11, which was ONLY to give an excuse for the endless 'war on terror', and thus control over the civilian populations and endless war.
Yep, and call me the eternal cynic but why now is this story making so many headlines? What's the back story for it?
We are at the HSCA/Jack Ruby's ties to the mob/Mafia-did-it stage of the official story evolution.

