23-04-2016, 06:12 PM
In my mind there are some people like Drago that, knowingly or not, perpetuate a want to chase finer definitions as an unconscious process in order to avoid the ugly necessity of actually having to do something. This isn't to say the pursuit of those finer distinctions isn't valid and doesn't produce some very good information that further clarifies the assassination. Drago in my mind is a good example of going too far on this particular sophistry and trying to limit it to this avenue and this avenue alone.
When it comes to the greater meaning of the assassination there's no doubt there's serious actionable evidence that elements of the US government were directly involved in the motives for the assassination, planning, setting-up of Oswald as a lone nut patsy at the covert level, and the cover-up that was consciously directed by either the actors or those who acted in accordance to their agenda, politics, and interests.
At this point if I were asked to weigh which was worse, potentially risking making a mistake about which exact government members were involved and precisely how, or forfeiting necessary action that does right and sets justice to this horrible violation of the sanctity of our nation and democracy by spending more time in detail, I think the moral call is clear and shouldn't be clouded by those who divert to the less important aspects of the greater moral need. I see some say we are being induced to argue forever yet then call for further elucidation when it comes to the exact definition instead of doing what obviously needs to be done. It is foolish to wait for the murderer's permission to do justice...
When it comes to the greater meaning of the assassination there's no doubt there's serious actionable evidence that elements of the US government were directly involved in the motives for the assassination, planning, setting-up of Oswald as a lone nut patsy at the covert level, and the cover-up that was consciously directed by either the actors or those who acted in accordance to their agenda, politics, and interests.
At this point if I were asked to weigh which was worse, potentially risking making a mistake about which exact government members were involved and precisely how, or forfeiting necessary action that does right and sets justice to this horrible violation of the sanctity of our nation and democracy by spending more time in detail, I think the moral call is clear and shouldn't be clouded by those who divert to the less important aspects of the greater moral need. I see some say we are being induced to argue forever yet then call for further elucidation when it comes to the exact definition instead of doing what obviously needs to be done. It is foolish to wait for the murderer's permission to do justice...