06-04-2016, 06:22 PM
Ray,
While you are absolutely correct, arguing with Brian/Albert is futile.
For you, and anyone else interested in this, post #137 in this thread at the EF has a nice approximation of a possible height comparison, and is a nice attempt at 3D rendering:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....16&page=10
However, we don't have PRECISE measurements of any architectural feature in the door way. We have estimates. Attempts at "geometry" etc are therefore estimates. The Darnell frame itself doesn't have three dimensions.
These are all guesses and estimates. Nothing can be proven from the extant data. Proposed? Yes. Hypothesized? Yes. Proven? NO.[/QUOTE]
Well said, Mr. Cross. Your last sentence is spot on.
That is why some of us realize that given either the unreliability and/or potentially biased interpretation of guesses and estimates (as you so aptly stated) we need something with more substance, something like specifics culled from evidence based research comes to mind.
As we enter Day Nine (9) of this Challenge presented within this thread, we have only one entity to date who has actually provided specifics rather than guesses and estimates. There's a reason for that.
Prayer Man didn't guess where He was? He didn't guess who was out there with Him? Evidence based research didn't estimate where He was when initially encountered by Officer Baker, it gave a specific location, at the front entrance, before Mr. Baker even begin his stairway to heaven climb.
The day is still young, so moving forward let's determine if prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, prayer pick a spawn, etc. can offer some specifics. A specific name, and a credible explanation to explain away the "any strangers" litmus test would be suffice to start with. Until either of these entities do so, they will continue to remain at a combined total score of (0). There is a reason for that.
For anyone not interested in mere guesstimating, an in depth Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8320&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8320&stc=1)
*Credit Ace Card Researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean)
While you are absolutely correct, arguing with Brian/Albert is futile.
For you, and anyone else interested in this, post #137 in this thread at the EF has a nice approximation of a possible height comparison, and is a nice attempt at 3D rendering:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....16&page=10
However, we don't have PRECISE measurements of any architectural feature in the door way. We have estimates. Attempts at "geometry" etc are therefore estimates. The Darnell frame itself doesn't have three dimensions.
These are all guesses and estimates. Nothing can be proven from the extant data. Proposed? Yes. Hypothesized? Yes. Proven? NO.[/QUOTE]
Well said, Mr. Cross. Your last sentence is spot on.
That is why some of us realize that given either the unreliability and/or potentially biased interpretation of guesses and estimates (as you so aptly stated) we need something with more substance, something like specifics culled from evidence based research comes to mind.
As we enter Day Nine (9) of this Challenge presented within this thread, we have only one entity to date who has actually provided specifics rather than guesses and estimates. There's a reason for that.
Prayer Man didn't guess where He was? He didn't guess who was out there with Him? Evidence based research didn't estimate where He was when initially encountered by Officer Baker, it gave a specific location, at the front entrance, before Mr. Baker even begin his stairway to heaven climb.
The day is still young, so moving forward let's determine if prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, prayer pick a spawn, etc. can offer some specifics. A specific name, and a credible explanation to explain away the "any strangers" litmus test would be suffice to start with. Until either of these entities do so, they will continue to remain at a combined total score of (0). There is a reason for that.
For anyone not interested in mere guesstimating, an in depth Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
*Credit Ace Card Researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean)