05-04-2016, 03:38 AM
Quote by Doyle
" Tony, I mentioned in my previous post that if Prayer Person was at the front of the landing and Tie Man was inside the foyer - if Prayer Person was of equal height to Tie Man that the perspective difference would actually make Prayer Person shorter. I see you somehow didn't answer that. Your methodology is complete garbage Tony. "
Is that a legitimate statement attributed to the individual following the words "Quote by"?
Now, moving along to the specific Challenge posed within this thread (something some people wish to avoid). There's a reason for that.
Here we are on the eve of Day Eight (8) and to date no specific evidence based research data has emerged establishing a legitimate existence of prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, prayer _______, etc. (0) There's a reason for that.
However, as this thread has already illustrated time and time again, Prayer Man is not void of specifics. It has been established that He was encountered at the front entrance before the script was revised upon his death. His matching airtight alibi states precisely where he was when the president came under attack. That was hidden away from public view/consumption for decades (Why?) There's a reason for that.
Meanwhile not a single shred of specific evidence supporting the legitimate existence of prayer woman and/or her spawn (0). There's a reason for that.
The opposition simply cannot offer the research community a specific name for any of these masquerading wannabes, nor offer any credible explanation to explain away the "any strangers" litmus test. There's a reason for that ----->
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8316&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8316&stc=1)
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8316&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8316&stc=1)
*Credit Ace Card Researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean)
How could a simple Challenge not even produce a single specific, substantial, evidence based legitimacy for any other entity bedsides Prayer Man?
Because, quite frankly, they have nothing (0)
" Tony, I mentioned in my previous post that if Prayer Person was at the front of the landing and Tie Man was inside the foyer - if Prayer Person was of equal height to Tie Man that the perspective difference would actually make Prayer Person shorter. I see you somehow didn't answer that. Your methodology is complete garbage Tony. "
Is that a legitimate statement attributed to the individual following the words "Quote by"?
Now, moving along to the specific Challenge posed within this thread (something some people wish to avoid). There's a reason for that.
Here we are on the eve of Day Eight (8) and to date no specific evidence based research data has emerged establishing a legitimate existence of prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, prayer _______, etc. (0) There's a reason for that.
However, as this thread has already illustrated time and time again, Prayer Man is not void of specifics. It has been established that He was encountered at the front entrance before the script was revised upon his death. His matching airtight alibi states precisely where he was when the president came under attack. That was hidden away from public view/consumption for decades (Why?) There's a reason for that.
Meanwhile not a single shred of specific evidence supporting the legitimate existence of prayer woman and/or her spawn (0). There's a reason for that.
The opposition simply cannot offer the research community a specific name for any of these masquerading wannabes, nor offer any credible explanation to explain away the "any strangers" litmus test. There's a reason for that ----->
*Credit Ace Card Researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean)
How could a simple Challenge not even produce a single specific, substantial, evidence based legitimacy for any other entity bedsides Prayer Man?
Because, quite frankly, they have nothing (0)

