30-03-2016, 09:13 PM
With a combined score of (0) we can only speculate some specifics may actually be produced at some point between the trailing tandem of prayer man and prayer person.
However, with Prayer Man, we have more than a few specifics already, including multiple people putting the wrongfully accused right where he says he was. There's a reason for that.
Let's update the Challenge Scoreboard...
Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. Thus the tally reads...
The wrongfully accused (5) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Bill Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
"They saw no one there" (There's a reason for that)
However, with Prayer Man, we have more than a few specifics already, including multiple people putting the wrongfully accused right where he says he was. There's a reason for that.
Let's update the Challenge Scoreboard...
Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. Thus the tally reads...
The wrongfully accused (5) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Bill Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
"They saw no one there" (There's a reason for that)