14-03-2016, 11:12 PM
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Michael Cross Wrote:Fascinating. He's pissy that I called him out on ignoring your public request to provide evidence of his assertions, but now he's doing it again?
Tom seems to be a dedicated researcher, but this is odd, at best.
Fascinating, I think Michael's an instigator.
No, I think Michael is just pointing to the obvious here. Tom Scully makes the vicious charge that my friend John Armstrong has stolen his "unique research specifics, in some excerpts almost word for word," and when I ask him at least FIFTEEN DIFFERENT TIMES NOW to give us some EVIDENCE, he just runs away and hides.
Man up, Mr. Scully. You can't back up your accusation, can you? We're waiting... and waiting... and waiting.
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996