13-03-2016, 06:11 PM
On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, there you go again, huffing and puffing instead of honestly addressing how the woman on just the 4th step can have her head at Mr. Oswald's mid-section IF he was much further up and well into the shadows w/Mr. Frazier. Just because you wish to avoid the obvious doesn't make the photo by Mr. Darnell any less credible because it demonstrates a massive hole in your "points".
All any honest, objective person reading along here wants is a fair and reasonable explanation why her head is already upon Mr. Oswald's mid-section before she even completes her full ascent, with several more steps to navigate (not an opinion, the photo speaks for itself). Moreover, upon moving her over to the right along the same plane, one can clearly see there are human figures standing before her and Mr. Frazier's position. Conversely, Mr. Doyle, there are no human figures between her and Mr. Oswald. Again, not merely an opinion, the photo speaks for itself.
Now, once again, you brought measurements into this matter, so, a sense of fairness on your part would understand all measurements should be taken into consideration, not just the ones you imagine is your "proof".
The photo speaks for itself. The lady in question has her head upon Mr. Oswald's mid-section though she is only 50% of the way to the top of the landing, having several more stairs to navigate. Is she 7'4" tall, Mr. Doyle? Does she have an extensively loooong neck, Mr. Doyle?
Please help us understand how her head is already upon Mr. Oswald's mid-section though she is only halfway in her ascent; and, please explain why when we move her along the same plane across to align with Mr. Frazier's position that there at least two human figures standing before her and him?, yet not a singe human figure stands between her head and Mr. Oswald's mid-section in her original position...
The Warren Commission was quick to discount all of the available evidence, Mr. Doyle, let's not "Rush to Judgement" here, let's be fair and account for what the photo demonstrates.
An objective Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away -----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
All any honest, objective person reading along here wants is a fair and reasonable explanation why her head is already upon Mr. Oswald's mid-section before she even completes her full ascent, with several more steps to navigate (not an opinion, the photo speaks for itself). Moreover, upon moving her over to the right along the same plane, one can clearly see there are human figures standing before her and Mr. Frazier's position. Conversely, Mr. Doyle, there are no human figures between her and Mr. Oswald. Again, not merely an opinion, the photo speaks for itself.
Now, once again, you brought measurements into this matter, so, a sense of fairness on your part would understand all measurements should be taken into consideration, not just the ones you imagine is your "proof".
The photo speaks for itself. The lady in question has her head upon Mr. Oswald's mid-section though she is only 50% of the way to the top of the landing, having several more stairs to navigate. Is she 7'4" tall, Mr. Doyle? Does she have an extensively loooong neck, Mr. Doyle?
Please help us understand how her head is already upon Mr. Oswald's mid-section though she is only halfway in her ascent; and, please explain why when we move her along the same plane across to align with Mr. Frazier's position that there at least two human figures standing before her and him?, yet not a singe human figure stands between her head and Mr. Oswald's mid-section in her original position...
The Warren Commission was quick to discount all of the available evidence, Mr. Doyle, let's not "Rush to Judgement" here, let's be fair and account for what the photo demonstrates.
An objective Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away -----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq

