A message from John Armstrong

[Scott Kaiser]

Jim, ask John if he would get a hold of me at my following email, scott-kaiser@hotmail.com I would like to send him something free, that he may read everything with careful thought.

It might be best, Scott, if you sent to me the material you would like to bring to John's attention, along with any explanations about it you'd care to provide. If it's relevant to his research on "Lee Harvey Oswald" and the fabricated "evidence" against him, I'll make sure he gets it.

You can reach me at Jimbotopia@gmail.com

Thanks.

Well Jim, you see, I just don't know how much of this pertains to Oswald, my mother seems to have a story about my father while he visited Miami in 1962-63, and, there's a phone number I followed up on with Miami Dade Public Library, according to them, the prefix 685-686 existed during that time, but the number in my father's address book does not exists. I discovered this number belonged to a CIA safe house in Miami and the number itself had never been resold. Perhaps, Oswald visited this place of residence just after George de Mohrenschildt's Christmas party in December 1962, and returning to Dallas on January of 1963. You see, it is the only time the FBI or any other three letter agency stopped reporting on Oswald, I suppose all the three letter agencies had dropped the ball because he was in Miami. And, it wouldn't have looked very good on the company had they reported Oswald in Miami during this time, it was on January 10, 1963 we know Oswald is back in Dallas because that was the day he sent his brother a post card from Dallas.

I also discovered two separate Lee's in my father's address book, one of the Lee's was the inside man for the Chilean Embassy break-ins that Frank Sturgis was apart of. This other Lee found is placed above Frank Sturgis' in my father's address book, the name is what has been giving me a hard time. Now, a third Lee with a last name has also been discovered in my father's FOIA documents, he went by the name of "Lee Pages", however, no such name exists, nowhere, and I have documented this information as well as provided proof in my new update.

I'm not publishing everything here, and there's a reason for that, there seems to be pirates who are only concerned with recognition then the truth.

Per the second part of your question about any fabricated evidence against him (John), I'm sorry, but I can't help you, but I can give you some free advise, that is, you have made your point, like I did, there's no need in pursuing something that's not there, you won't get any proof from Tom, and I won't get any apologizes. Perhaps, we both should just leave well enough alone, and move forward with what many good researchers, with good intentions would want, like John.