21-10-2015, 06:14 AM
Hi Scott - two dozen witnesses would probably agree with you, but are you seriously basing your conclusion on the altered Zapruder film?
The problem with issues like these is there is contrary evidence. Any credible crime scene model has to address the contrary evidence.
The most damning part of the contrary evidence (relative to your claim) is the alleged fracture lines in Kennedy's skull, which would seem to indicate a rear entry. Are you going to say the autopsy was staged or somehow corrupted? Or, how would you explain the medical evidence that indicates the fatal shot came from behind?
The best evidence for a frontal shot is the 85-or-so people who ran up the grassy knoll, 'cause they saw puffs of smoke or heard rifle fire or whatever.
But the Z-film has been demonstrably altered, that can be easily shown both within individual frames and from one frame to the next. Zapruder himself says he filmed the turn sequence which is missing from the public version. Are you familiar with the chain of custody of the film and its copies?
The problem with issues like these is there is contrary evidence. Any credible crime scene model has to address the contrary evidence.
The most damning part of the contrary evidence (relative to your claim) is the alleged fracture lines in Kennedy's skull, which would seem to indicate a rear entry. Are you going to say the autopsy was staged or somehow corrupted? Or, how would you explain the medical evidence that indicates the fatal shot came from behind?
The best evidence for a frontal shot is the 85-or-so people who ran up the grassy knoll, 'cause they saw puffs of smoke or heard rifle fire or whatever.
But the Z-film has been demonstrably altered, that can be easily shown both within individual frames and from one frame to the next. Zapruder himself says he filmed the turn sequence which is missing from the public version. Are you familiar with the chain of custody of the film and its copies?