16-10-2015, 04:40 PM
Drew... you are aware of the terrible strain the DPD put upon Craig, right?
The denials by Fritz of Craig's validity as well as anything he supposedly said.
Like a fairly large handful of witnesses Craig was treated to attacks from all angles designed to undermine his credibility... people like Yates and Bolden, Benavidas and so many others who were targeted for everything from forced insanity to outright execution.
"Craig probably was bi-polar" yet he was able to be this "rising star" and well decorated officer.... until his statements ran contrary to the official story.
Let's please try and remember that The Evidence IS the Conspiracy Drew... that virtually every single item and story offered comes with it tons of baggage which remders it moot and misrepresentative of what actually happened.
"Never believe anything the government says until it has been officially denied" is one of the laws of Watergate politics
Try watching the news or re-reading history with that in mind and you will see how this consistently bears out.
Next look at the JFK evidence.. case in point, on Jan 27, 1964 a discussion was had about the autopsy evidence.
In this one passage we learn
1) the extant autopsy report contradicts Rankin's parahrasing of what it says
2) it confirms the back entry wound was lower than the exit requirinig the path to be UPWARD at 11 degrees
3) it confirms the FBI Siebert/O'Neill report about what Humes said about the wound
4) it confirms that the bullet would need to TURN in mid air for any of this to work.
5) and finally - it shows how this autopsy report which is NOT in evidence "officially denies" what was first said and written about the wound.
Mr. Rankin:
Then theres a great range of material in regards to the wound and theautopsy and this point of exit or entrance of the bullet in the front of theneck, and that all has to be developed much more than we have at the presenttime.
We have an explanation there in the autopsy that probably a fragmentcame out the front of the neck, but with the elevation the shot must have comefrom, and the angle, it seems quite apparent, since we have the picture ofwhere the bullet entered in the back, that the bullet entered below theshoulder blade to the right of the backbone, which is below the place where thepicture shows the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt in front, andthe bullet, according to the autopsy didn't strike any bone at all, thatparticular bullet, and go through.
So that how it could turn, and --
Rep. Boggs. I thought I read that bullet just went in a finger's length.
Mr. Rankin. That is what they first said
Followed by Redlich, a few months later in April telling Rankin: this first statement sums up the entirety of the LNer and WCR effort... it was all smoke and mirrors
DJ
Our intention is not to establish the point with completeaccuracy, but merely to substantiate the
hypothesis which underlies the conclusions that Oswald wasthe sole assassin.
.....
I should addthat the facts which we now have in our
possession,submitted to us in separate reports from the FBI and
SecretService, are totally incorrect and, if left uncorrected, will
present acompletely misleading picture.
The denials by Fritz of Craig's validity as well as anything he supposedly said.
Like a fairly large handful of witnesses Craig was treated to attacks from all angles designed to undermine his credibility... people like Yates and Bolden, Benavidas and so many others who were targeted for everything from forced insanity to outright execution.
"Craig probably was bi-polar" yet he was able to be this "rising star" and well decorated officer.... until his statements ran contrary to the official story.
Let's please try and remember that The Evidence IS the Conspiracy Drew... that virtually every single item and story offered comes with it tons of baggage which remders it moot and misrepresentative of what actually happened.
"Never believe anything the government says until it has been officially denied" is one of the laws of Watergate politics
Try watching the news or re-reading history with that in mind and you will see how this consistently bears out.
Next look at the JFK evidence.. case in point, on Jan 27, 1964 a discussion was had about the autopsy evidence.
In this one passage we learn
1) the extant autopsy report contradicts Rankin's parahrasing of what it says
2) it confirms the back entry wound was lower than the exit requirinig the path to be UPWARD at 11 degrees
3) it confirms the FBI Siebert/O'Neill report about what Humes said about the wound
4) it confirms that the bullet would need to TURN in mid air for any of this to work.
5) and finally - it shows how this autopsy report which is NOT in evidence "officially denies" what was first said and written about the wound.
Mr. Rankin:
Then theres a great range of material in regards to the wound and theautopsy and this point of exit or entrance of the bullet in the front of theneck, and that all has to be developed much more than we have at the presenttime.
We have an explanation there in the autopsy that probably a fragmentcame out the front of the neck, but with the elevation the shot must have comefrom, and the angle, it seems quite apparent, since we have the picture ofwhere the bullet entered in the back, that the bullet entered below theshoulder blade to the right of the backbone, which is below the place where thepicture shows the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt in front, andthe bullet, according to the autopsy didn't strike any bone at all, thatparticular bullet, and go through.
So that how it could turn, and --
Rep. Boggs. I thought I read that bullet just went in a finger's length.
Mr. Rankin. That is what they first said
Followed by Redlich, a few months later in April telling Rankin: this first statement sums up the entirety of the LNer and WCR effort... it was all smoke and mirrors
DJ
Our intention is not to establish the point with completeaccuracy, but merely to substantiate the
hypothesis which underlies the conclusions that Oswald wasthe sole assassin.
.....
I should addthat the facts which we now have in our
possession,submitted to us in separate reports from the FBI and
SecretService, are totally incorrect and, if left uncorrected, will
present acompletely misleading picture.
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter