20-09-2015, 01:34 AM
Tom:
I don't know what you are talking about. (I hope it was tongue in cheek.)
I have always qualified my belief about PM. But that is something different, dealing with photographic evidence and an alibi for Oswald,
Piper was trying to build a conspiratorial construct that somehow included the Mossad as part of the plot of kill Kennedy. I thought it was a very weak effort, to put it mildly.
I have been studying this case day after day for about 22 years. I have read scores of books, reviewed well over a hundred, written dozens of essays, edited and published Probe Magazine for seven years, written four books myself. In my opinion, Harry Livingstone left a more valuable legacy behind than Piper did.. At least he did some original and valuable work on the medical evidence. And he may be correct on the Z film alteration issue.
But Piper's book offered no real evidence except the most tenuous of name associations. It seemed to work backward, which is never a good sign. That is: I want to get Israel mixed up in this, how do I do it?
BTW, its not fun for me to do this. Just like its not fun for me to defend Bush against that charlatan Hankey. Why? Because I think Bush I should have ben in jail over Iran/Contra and other crimes. As per Israel, I am all for a two state solution and look askance at how gutless American presidents, besides Carter, have been in the face of the Israeli Lobby. (And I should add, Peter Novick's book, The Holocaust in American Life, should be read by everyone.)
But as far as killing Kennedy, I mean, I just don't see it, just like I don't see Bush in it either.
I don't know what you are talking about. (I hope it was tongue in cheek.)
I have always qualified my belief about PM. But that is something different, dealing with photographic evidence and an alibi for Oswald,
Piper was trying to build a conspiratorial construct that somehow included the Mossad as part of the plot of kill Kennedy. I thought it was a very weak effort, to put it mildly.
I have been studying this case day after day for about 22 years. I have read scores of books, reviewed well over a hundred, written dozens of essays, edited and published Probe Magazine for seven years, written four books myself. In my opinion, Harry Livingstone left a more valuable legacy behind than Piper did.. At least he did some original and valuable work on the medical evidence. And he may be correct on the Z film alteration issue.
But Piper's book offered no real evidence except the most tenuous of name associations. It seemed to work backward, which is never a good sign. That is: I want to get Israel mixed up in this, how do I do it?
BTW, its not fun for me to do this. Just like its not fun for me to defend Bush against that charlatan Hankey. Why? Because I think Bush I should have ben in jail over Iran/Contra and other crimes. As per Israel, I am all for a two state solution and look askance at how gutless American presidents, besides Carter, have been in the face of the Israeli Lobby. (And I should add, Peter Novick's book, The Holocaust in American Life, should be read by everyone.)
But as far as killing Kennedy, I mean, I just don't see it, just like I don't see Bush in it either.