Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Albert Doyle]

What does Carolyn Arnold have to do with Dunce MacRae's cartoon alterations of the Prayer Man still?

Playing dumb again Bob? You're calling obvious evidence 'alterations' in order to avoid answering what it shows. Not very honest of you Bob. I don't think they are alterations and I think you can trace them back to the original Darnell still.



Carolyn Arnold complained to Golz that FBI altered her statement that she saw Oswald at 12:25 when she left the building. Your cult leader Parker gave a very impressive imitation of one of Judyth Baker's long drawn out excuses in order to account for it. Typical of Parker he patronized a real time witness, Mrs Arnold, and told her why her memory was wrong. He honored FBI's 12:15 time, that Mrs Arnold protested was wrong, and claimed she confused her second statement where she told FBI she left the Depository for good at 12:25 with her original statement where she told FBI she left the 2nd floor at 12:15. Greg then says this proves Mrs Arnold saw Oswald in the lunch-room at 12:15.

It's obvious what you are doing here Bob is answering a question with a question in order to avoid answering. Why don't you have your cult leader answer my original post and the specific points it made? It pointed out that by Greg's theory Carolyn Arnold would had to have taken 10 minutes to leave the 2nd floor and finally exit the Depository at 12:25, as Greg is claiming. That was a 1 minute walk, so Greg has some explaining to do. Also, Greg is proposing that Carolyn Arnold left the Depository for good at 12:25. But why would she leave the Depository for good if Kennedy wasn't shot until 5 minutes later? Could it be Bob, that the timing of the 1 minute walk from the 2nd floor lunch-room to a 12:25 final exit marks Mrs Arnold's lunch-room witnessing as occurring at 12:24-25? Could it be that instead of Greg's correction of live witness, Mrs Arnold, that her protest that she saw Oswald at 12:25 and FBI altered it to 12:15 is correct? Could it be that what I wrote confirms it by logic crosseye'd Greg missed and both of you haven't been able to answer?


Do I need to explain that if Oswald was in the lunch-room at 12:25 then he wasn't out on the front steps as Prayer Man?


Bob, instead of answering this directly what Parker does is give a speech to himself where he mulls over the same stuff without ever answering the points. He does that because he can't answer point for point. He thinks calling it obtuse will relieve him of answering what he's clearly unable to answer. He stays desperately away from answering any of my direct points. For instance he never makes any attempt to explain why his theory requires Carolyn Arnold to take 10 minutes to walk the 1 minute route from the 2nd floor to the exit? Greg's not going to answer that. The reason why is because he can't. He also never touches why Mrs Arnold would leave the Depository for good at 12:25? - 5 minutes before JFK was shot. Another example of Greg's credulous offerings is he says Piper's claim that he spoke to Oswald on the 1st floor proves Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald at 12:15. That's a completely confused and inaccurate statement. First off, Piper said he saw Oswald at noon. So his sighting has nothing to do with anything and doesn't answer anything. It's just a typical Parker non-sequitir that is thrown in there as a prop claiming to answer the issue when in fact it is just a space filler being used to avoid giving a valid answer. Piper seeing Oswald at noon means absolutely nothing in relation to the conflicts I pointed out in Greg's claim. Parker's getting away with murder because he repeats that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald on the 1st floor despite her iron clad quote that she never saw Oswald there. And people let him get away with it without saying anything. I guess people who deal at a trolling level miss it too. Wake up Bob. Your boy is a fraud as this proves.



.