16-07-2015, 03:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-07-2015, 06:07 PM by Albert Doyle.)
It makes you wonder how many false defectors like Webster were referred to as "Project"? Or anybody.
Deniers try not to notice the huge pile of evidence they have to ignore in order to make their dismissive arguments.
You can imagine the file tracing that could be done if they knew the Oswald cryptonym.
I think it is time for H&L defenders to ignore some obvious trolls who will say anything to deny the obvious. Imagine someone patronizing Wilcott by saying he believed what he said was true while ignoring that what he said was Oswald was identified by a CIA case officer as being a "project" with a cryptonym. That by some perverted twist of logic that you could think this was true yet it had no significance. The deniers are sick people that shouldn't be taken seriously. The deniers are basically trolling.
.
Deniers try not to notice the huge pile of evidence they have to ignore in order to make their dismissive arguments.
You can imagine the file tracing that could be done if they knew the Oswald cryptonym.
I think it is time for H&L defenders to ignore some obvious trolls who will say anything to deny the obvious. Imagine someone patronizing Wilcott by saying he believed what he said was true while ignoring that what he said was Oswald was identified by a CIA case officer as being a "project" with a cryptonym. That by some perverted twist of logic that you could think this was true yet it had no significance. The deniers are sick people that shouldn't be taken seriously. The deniers are basically trolling.
.