+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: JFK Assassination (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Greg Parker Moderated? (/thread-12377.html)
Greg Parker Moderated? - Bob Prudhomme - 02-04-2014
Has Greg Parker been moderated? Is this why I no longer see his posts?
Greg Parker Moderated? - Lauren Johnson - 02-04-2014
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Has Greg Parker been moderated? Is this why I no longer see his posts?
Yes. Moderation means that his posts need to be approved.
Greg Parker Moderated? - Bob Prudhomme - 02-04-2014
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Has Greg Parker been moderated? Is this why I no longer see his posts?
Yes. Moderation means that his posts need to be approved.
What, in particular, prompted this action?
Greg Parker Moderated? - Lauren Johnson - 02-04-2014
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Has Greg Parker been moderated? Is this why I no longer see his posts?
Yes. Moderation means that his posts need to be approved.
What, in particular, prompted this action?
You know the answer. Moderators conversations are not public affairs. Nice try.
Greg Parker Moderated? - Dawn Meredith - 02-04-2014
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Was this thread necessary???Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Has Greg Parker been moderated? Is this why I no longer see his posts?
Yes. Moderation means that his posts need to be approved.
What, in particular, prompted this action?
You know the answer. Moderators conversations are not public affairs. Nice try.
We have a zero policy re flaming. So I hope all will observe. Parker is not the only one deserving of moderation.
Obey the rules or banning follows moderation.
As to his own forum. We don't get to make their rules any more than we would tell John Simpkin to
delete the lone nutters. That said if I am liabled there this is a different matter. Made fun of- or some one like Wayne Dunn wondering how I ever GOT to be a lawyer
is not worth my time even reading. Only report actual abuse. Accusing me of something in my personal or professional life. Being made fun of is not that. It is just mindless mindgames. To answer your silly question Mr Dunn: I went to college, then went to law school, then I passed the Bar in MA in 1985. I have a perfect record re discipline. You are welcome to look me up on the TX bar website. I'm actually pretty much an open book. But I don't suffer fools lightly.
Perhaps you should take the LSAT, provided you have a college degree. ::rockon::
Dawn
Greg Parker Moderated? - Greg R Parker - 02-04-2014
Dawn Meredith Wrote:I was placed on moderation AFTER i stopped returning fire. The flaming however, continued against me after that point.Lauren Johnson Wrote:Was this thread necessary???Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Yes. Moderation means that his posts need to be approved.
What, in particular, prompted this action?
You know the answer. Moderators conversations are not public affairs. Nice try.
We have a zero policy re flaming. So I hope all will observe. Parker is not the only one deserving of moderation.
Obey the rules or banning follows moderation.
As to his own forum. We don't get to make their rules any more than we would tell John Simpkin to
delete the lone nutters. That said if I am liabled there this is a different matter. Made fun of- or some one like Wayne Dunn wondering how I ever GOT to be a lawyer
is not worth my time even reading. Only report actual abuse. Accusing me of something in my personal or professional life. Being made fun of is not that. It is just mindless mindgames. To answer your silly question Mr Dunn: I went to college, then went to law school, then I passed the Bar in MA in 1985. I have a perfect record re discipline. You are welcome to look me up on the TX bar website. I'm actually pretty much an open book. But I don't suffer fools lightly.
Perhaps you should take the LSAT, provide you have a college degree. ::rockon::
Dawn
As for whatever was said about you at reopenjfkcase.net - I am no more responsible for it than you are for what other say here about me. In fact, I no longer run the site. I handed the reigns over several months ago to two others - one of whom happens to support the Harvey & Lee theory.
Now can this silly moderation be stopped and the hidden thread returned please?
Greg Parker Moderated? - Bob Prudhomme - 02-04-2014
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Was this thread necessary???Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Lauren Johnson Wrote:Yes. Moderation means that his posts need to be approved.
What, in particular, prompted this action?
You know the answer. Moderators conversations are not public affairs. Nice try.
We have a zero policy re flaming. So I hope all will observe. Parker is not the only one deserving of moderation.
Obey the rules or banning follows moderation.
As to his own forum. We don't get to make their rules any more than we would tell John Simpkin to
delete the lone nutters. That said if I am liabled there this is a different matter. Made fun of- or some one like Wayne Dunn wondering how I ever GOT to be a lawyer
is not worth my time even reading. Only report actual abuse. Accusing me of something in my personal or professional life. Being made fun of is not that. It is just mindless mindgames. To answer your silly question Mr Dunn: I went to college, then went to law school, then I passed the Bar in MA in 1985. I have a perfect record re discipline. You are welcome to look me up on the TX bar website. I'm actually pretty much an open book. But I don't suffer fools lightly.
Perhaps you should take the LSAT, provide you have a college degree. ::rockon::
Dawn
I was just curious.
Greg Parker Moderated? - David Guyatt - 03-04-2014
Let me confirm that moderation of Greg has been removed.
I've been absent for the past two days with a pre-booked 2 day break with my wife ('putters strictly kept absent from the trip) and with Magda still be unable to get online, the admin housework was not able to be done.
Greg has been made aware of how this all came about - mostly all confusion on my part, and an apology has been given to him by me about this.
I also have no problem in saying that he has behaved impeccably since being asked to moderate his language, and we are grateful to him - and other members too - for toning down the rhetoric.
Greg Parker Moderated? - Dawn Meredith - 03-04-2014
Greg R Parker Wrote:Thanks Greg. Interesting that no-one bothered to tell me that. ( you handing over the reigns) You and I have never had a problem in the past so the emails and PMs I was getting about the treatment of me on "your" forum came as a surprise. Not to say that being made fun of there is anything but spiteful and stupid, I can't take it seriously when I have had almost no contact with them. Bernie what's his face referred to me as "private Meredith" What ever the hell that means. It is a military term and anyone who knows me knows I a have been totally anti war my entire life.Dawn Meredith Wrote:I was placed on moderation AFTER i stopped returning fire. The flaming however, continued against me after that point.Lauren Johnson Wrote:Was this thread necessary???Bob Prudhomme Wrote:What, in particular, prompted this action?
You know the answer. Moderators conversations are not public affairs. Nice try.
We have a zero policy re flaming. So I hope all will observe. Parker is not the only one deserving of moderation.
Obey the rules or banning follows moderation.
As to his own forum. We don't get to make their rules any more than we would tell John Simpkin to
delete the lone nutters. That said if I am liabled there this is a different matter. Made fun of- or some one like Wayne Dunn wondering how I ever GOT to be a lawyer
is not worth my time even reading. Only report actual abuse. Accusing me of something in my personal or professional life. Being made fun of is not that. It is just mindless mindgames. To answer your silly question Mr Dunn: I went to college, then went to law school, then I passed the Bar in MA in 1985. I have a perfect record re discipline. You are welcome to look me up on the TX bar website. I'm actually pretty much an open book. But I don't suffer fools lightly.
Perhaps you should take the LSAT, provided you have a college degree. ::rockon::
Dawn
As for whatever was said about you at reopenjfkcase.net - I am no more responsible for it than you are for what other say here about me. In fact, I no longer run the site. I handed the reigns over several months ago to two others - one of whom happens to support the Harvey & Lee theory.
Now can this silly moderation be stopped and the hidden thread returned please?
So yes let's all move on.
Peace.
Dawn
PS We shall agree to disagree about Harvey and Lee. I believe if you decide to actually read the book you will change your view. But perhaps not. I hope we can let the H and L stuff drop and you tell us about YOUR book.