+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Science and Technology (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: Detecting Photgraphic Fakes In The Time of Computers (/thread-389.html)
Detecting Photgraphic Fakes In The Time of Computers - Dawn Meredith - 26-11-2008
Interesting that Wecht disagreed with Lifton. I think body alteration is irrefutable, much more evidence to support this has been uncovered and cooraborated since Best Evidence. Shit, (FBI) ONeil /Silbert Report says it, and that's "official". And photo alteration occurred as well.
Good reasons CD. All of the above. Confuse, confabulate, fuck with our heads, and do it in our very faces.
Researchers who are on to something and it's proof of conspiracy have a way of just dying young, especially when they work solo. Hearing the description of Wilson reminded me of Jay Harrison, to whom I just used to refer as Secret agent man. (But Jay did trust too, and both proved to be his downfall).
Dawn
Detecting Photgraphic Fakes In The Time of Computers - Jack White - 27-11-2008
Right. Body alteration first, then photo alteration. Both.
Jack
Detecting Photgraphic Fakes In The Time of Computers - Peter Lemkin - 07-12-2008
See last chapter in new book by Russell for what I think is definitive answer here.