![]() |
|
US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Panopticon of Global Surveillance (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-42.html) +--- Thread: US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance (/thread-10838.html) |
US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 30-06-2013 Exposing the Dark Forces Behind the Snowden Smears Who is planting anti-Snowden attacks with Buzzfeed, and why is the website playing along? By Max Blumenthal June 29, 2013 "Information Clearing House - "Alternet" --- Since journalist Glenn Greenwald revealed the existence of the National Security Agency's PRISM domestic surveillance program, he and his source, the whistleblower Edward Snowden, have come in for a series of ugly attacks. On June 26, the day that the New York Daily News published a straightforward smear piece [3] on Greenwald, the website Buzzfeed rolled out a remarkably similar article, [4] a lengthy profile that focused on Greenwald's personal life and supposed eccentricities. Both outlets attempted to make hay out of Greenwald's involvement over a decade ago on the business end of a porn distribution company, an arcane detail that had little, if any, bearing on the domestic spying scandal he sparked. The coordinated nature of the smears prompted Reuters media columnist Jack Shafer to ask if an opposition research firm [5] was behind them. "I wonder who commissioned the file," he mused on Twitter. A day before the Greenwald attacks appeared, Buzzfeed published an anonymously sourced story [6] about the government of Ecuador, which had reportedly offered asylum to Snowden (Ecuador has just revoked a temporary travel document [7] issued to Snowden). Written by Rosie Gray and Adrian Carasquillo, the article relied on documents marked as "secret" that were passed to Buzzfeed by sources described as "activists who wished to call attention to the [Ecuadorian] government's spying practices in the context of its new international role" as the possible future sanctuary of Snowden. Gray and Carasquillo reported that Ecuador's intelligence service had attempted to procure surveillance technology from two Israeli firms. Without firm proof that the system was ever put into use, the authors claimed the documents "suggest a commitment to domestic surveillance that rivals the practices by the United States' National Security Agency." (Buzzfeed has never published a critical report on the $3 billion in aid the US provides to Israel each year, which is used to buy equipment explicitly designed for repressing, spying on and killing occupied Palestinians). Buzzfeed's Ecuador expose supported a theme increasingly advanced [8] by Snowden's critics -- that the hero of civil libertarians and government transparency activists was, in fact, a self-interested hypocrite content to seek sanctuary from undemocratic regimes. Curiously, those who seized on the story had no problem with Buzzfeed's reporters relying on leaked government documents marked as classified. For some Snowden detractors, the issue was apparently not his leaking, but which government his leaks embarrassed. Questionable journalism ethics, evidence of smears At first glance, Buzzfeed's Ecuador expose might have seemed like riveting material. Upon closer examination, however, the story turned out to be anything but the exclusive the website promoted it as. In fact, the news of Ecuador's possible deal with Israeli surveillance firms was reported [9] hours before Buzzfeed's piece appeared by Aleksander Boyd, a blogger and activist with close ties to right-wing elements in South America. "Rafael Correa's Ecuadorian regime spies on its citizens in a way strikingly similar to what Snowden accuses the U.S. of doing," claimed Boyd. Later in the day, Boyd contacted Buzzfeed's Gray through Twitter, complimenting her piece before commenting, [10] "Evidently Ecuadorian source leaked same info to you guys, seems I jumped the gun before you…" ![]() Since Boyd contacted Gray, who has not publicly responded, Buzzfeed has not credited him or altered its headline to acknowledge that its story was not an exclusive. Buzzfeed's refusal to acknowledge Boyd was not only a testament to the kind of questionable practices [11] that have plagued the outlet [12] since its inception, it helped obscure the story's disturbing origins. Boyd's disclosure that a single source shopped opposition research to him and Buzzfeed at the same time confirmed the existence of a coordinated campaign orchestrated by elements exploiting the Snowden drama for political gain. Boyd's remark that he "jumped the gun" suggests that the source intended for Buzzfeed to be the first to publish the story, and that he inadvertently embarrassed the site by running with it before them. There is also the possibility that Boyd was the source all along, and that his tweet to Gray was designed to establish deniability. Either way, the source seemed to be carefully managing the operation, wielding Snowden as a cudgel against the Ecuadorian government and timing the story for maximum impact. Soliciting smears, dreaming of headless opponents Who is Boyd, and how did he appear in the middle of the Snowden saga? A London-based representative of Venezuela's political opposition, Boyd solicits his services as an opposition researcher, informing potential clients through his official bio, [13] "Alek can be contracted to do due diligence on individuals and companies in Venezuela and LatAm." As I reported for The Electronic Intifada [14], Boyd has repeatedly promoted terrorism and assassination against members of the elected government of Venezuela. Back in 2004, Boyd wrote, "I wish I could decapitate in public plazas [Venezuelan politicians] Lina Ron and Diosdado Cabello. I wish I could torture for the rest of his remaining existence Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel … I wish I could fly over Caracas slums throwing the dead bodies of the criminals that have destroyed my country … Only barbaric practices will neutralize them, much the same way [Genghis] Khan did. I wish I was him." A year later, he declared, "Re: advocating for violence yes I have mentioned in many occasions that in my view that is the only solution left for dealing with [Hugo] Chavez." In 2008, Boyd's services were contracted by the Human Rights Foundation (HRF), an NGO run by a veteran conservative activist named Thor Halvorssen. [14] The son of a Venezuelan oligarch and former CIA asset who funneled money to the Nicaraguan Contras, Halvorssen founded HRF to publicize the human rights abuses of Hugo Chavez's government. His first cousin, Leopoldo Lopez, the son of an oil industry executive, is one of the most visible leaders of the Venezuelan opposition, and as such, has received substantial financial support from the US. In 2002, Lopez was among the politicians who momentarily seized power from Chavez during a failed coup attempt. At the 2010 Oslo Freedom Forum, a yearly confab Halvorssen promotes as "the Davos of human rights," Lopez was presented to an audience of foreign correspondents and diplomats as a "human rights leader." Boyd claimed [15] that during his year and a half working for Halvorssen, he successfully campaigned for the release of Guadelupe Llori, an Ecuadorian opposition politician jailed by Correa under charges of sabotage and terrorism for her role in leading a crippling oil workers' strike. (After her release, Llori was junketed to Halvorssen's Oslo Freedom Forum). During this time Boyd visited Llori in prison in Ecuador while meeting [16] opposition activists "to coordinate future projects," as he told an interviewer. Whether this was how he made initial contact with the source that supplied him and Buzzfeed with the documents on Ecuador's deal with the Israeli surveillance firms is unknown. Boyd may have never met Buzzfeed's Gray, however, each are well acquainted with Halvorssen. This May, Gray was among the select cadre of journalists flown to the Oslo Freedom Forum to provide positive PR for Halvorssen and his global operation. Gray returned with a fawning profile [17] of Halvorssen, portraying him as an iconoclastic activist whose "job of opposing strongmen is arguably more media-friendly than that of anyone doing human rights work today." In contrast to Buzzfeed's profile of Greenwald, Gray cast Halvorssen's eccentricities as charming quirks that bore little relevance to the larger story. And his intimate ties to the right-wing Venezuelan opposition and the oligarchic forces seeking to topple socialist-oriented governments in South America went unmentioned. Right-wing corporate lobbyists target Correa Ecuador's Correa is among the most popular of the Latin American leaders to embrace Hugo Chavez's socialist economic model. Having defiantly defaulted on $3.2 billion in foreign loans, he has been able to leverage his country's oil wealth to drastically expand social programs, improving access to education and doubling spending on healthcare while lowering poverty rates by a remarkable five percent since he took office in 2007. Naturally, Correa's rejection of neoliberal policies has earned him a fair share of enemies, especially among the elites who have traditionally governed Ecuador. In 2010, he resisted a coup attempt [18] led by Lucio Gutierrez, a former president who earned the wrath of Ecuador's poor by implementing crushing IMF-imposed austerity measures. Correa's opponents may have resorted to zero-sum politics, but his response has not always been judicious. He has, for example, advanced [19] criminal libel laws as a means of punishing opposition media and has battled indigenous groups that protested his attempts to open their land up to wide-scale state mining operations. The Committee to Protect Journalists has accused [20] Correa of leading Ecuador "into a new era of widespread repression." Of all the enemies Correa has earned, some of his fiercest reside not in Quito, but in the conservative think tanks of Washington. They include George W. Bush's former Latin America handlers and a coterie of corporate-bankrolled right-wing radicals determined to unravel the South American socialist bloc. Ezequiel Vazquez Ger, [21] an Argentina-born economist, is among the most aggressive of Correa's antagonists. Vazquez Ger works for a DC-based lobbying firm run by Otto Reich, a Cuban exile who served as the Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs under the second Bush administration. In 1987, Reich was singled out [22] during the US Comptroller General's investigation of Iran-Contra for having "engaged in prohibited, covert propaganda activities" on behalf of the Nicaraguan Contras. He is also suspected [23] of helping the anti-Castro terrorist Orlando Bosch escape prosecution in Venezuela. Reich contracted Vazquez Ger in 2011 to help him oversee a portfolio of corporate clients [24] that included Lockheed Martin, Exxon Mobil, and Bacardi International, the rum company whose lawyers drafted much of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act tightening the US embargo of Cuba. Before he partnered with Reich, Vazquez Ger served as a Latin American fellow at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, [25] a corporate funded think tank that promotes climate change denialism and sweeping deregulation policies. To compliment their lobbying operation, Vazquez Ger and Reich have churned out a steady stream [21] of op-eds for publications from Foreign Policy to Fox News to the Miami Herald, [26] demonizing the socialist leaders of South America who have stifled the ambitions of multi-national corporations. During the past year, they homed in on Correa, assailing him for sheltering Assange while he cracked down on opposition media. In a June 2012 op-ed [27] for the right-wing Newsmax website, Reich and Vazquez Ger cited Assange as a key reason why the US should refuse to sign any further trade agreements with Ecuador. "Signing or renewing trade agreements with Ecuador will only allow Rafael Correa to continue undermining US foreign policy," they wrote, "trading with our enemies, and destroying his country's democracy." (Following threats from Congress over its alleged offer to shelter Snowden, Ecuador's government unilaterally rejected [28] US trade preferences). When Buzzfeed published its expose on Ecuador, Vazquez Ger was overjoyed. A heavily trafficked US news site had recycled he and Reich's attacks on Correa's support for Assange, this time framing Ecuador's president as a hypocrite for supposedly offering asylum to Snowden. At 7:28 PM on June 25 -- a full 27 minutes after the article appeared -- Vazquez Ger took to Twitter to promote [29] the piece to his Spanish-language followers. Next, he personally thanked [30] Buzzfeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith "for unmasking [Correa's] hypocrisy." The following day, at a press conference in Ecuador, Interior Minister Jose Serrano was asked to answer for the Buzzfeed report. Buzzfeed's Gray quickly picked up Serrano's defensive comments, quoting them [31] in a follow-up story alongside a strident denunciation of Correa's sheltering of Assange by Cléver Jiménez, a key opposition leader. Meanwhile, Alek Boyd projected the story of Ecuador's surveillance deal into South American media, publishing it as an "exclusive" [32] in Semana, a leading Colombian daily. Whoever planted the story with Buzzfeed appeared to have scored a major success, exploiting the Snowden drama to tarnish the image of Ecuador's government. Though the identity of the source that triggered the operation may never be known, their agenda does not seem to be much of a mystery anymore. Max Blumenthal is the author of Republican Gomorrah (Basic/Nation Books, 2009). Twitter at @MaxBlumenthal
US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Peter Lemkin - 30-06-2013 "Network Hygiene" leads to Mental Hygiene; which necessitates Mind Control and Brain Washing.......We are WAY beyond '1984' now, Toto! :nono: US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Peter Lemkin - 02-07-2013 [TABLE="width: 100%"] [TR] [TD="width: 84%"] FISA Judge Who Approved Massive NSA Spying Identified?By Rob Kall [TABLE="width: 100%"][TR] [TD="width: 60%"] [/TD] [TD="width: 40%"] 6/30/13[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [/TD] [TD="width: 16%"] [/TR] [/TABLE] Secret-court judges upset at portrayal of "collaboration' with government. And the article does report that the judge was annoyed that the idea of collaborating with the government was an inaccurate portrayal. But it seems that the bigger story is that this judge is THE judge, who, all alone, decided that it was okay for the NSA and whoever else had access, to spy on ALL Americans. Her name is Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. ![]() Colleen Kollar-Kotelly by Wikipedia Here's the excerpt from the WaPo article that is most significant: On July 14, 2004, the surveillance court for the first time approved the gathering of information by the NSA, which created the equivalent of a digital vault to hold Internet metadata. Kollar-Kotelly's order authorized the metadata program under a FISA provision known as the "pen register/trap and trace," or PRTT. The ruling was a secret not just to the public and most of Congress, but to all of Kollar-Kotelly's surveillance court colleagues. Under orders from the president, none of the court's other 10 members could be told about the Internet metadata program, which was one prong of a larger and highly classified data-gathering effort known as the President's Surveillance Program, or PSP. But the importance of her order -- which approved the collection based on a 1986 law typically used for phone records -- was hard to overstate. "The order essentially gave NSA the same authority to collect bulk Internet metadata that it had under the PSP," the inspector general's report said, with some minor caveats including reducing the number of people who could access the records. On May 24, 2006, Kollar-Kotelly signed another order, this one authorizing the bulk collection of phone metadata from U.S. phone companies, under a FISA provision known as Section 215, or the "business records provision," of the USA Patriot Act. "
A 2006 Washingtonpost article also mentions Kollar-Kotelly, so the news is not a first time revelation of her tie to the authorization. The older article also refers to her predecessor, Royce C. Lamberth and suggests that they had serious concerns about the legality of the program, instituted when George W. Bush was president; " Both judges expressed concern to senior officials that the president's program, if ever made public and challenged in court, ran a significant risk of being declared unconstitutional, according to sources familiar with their actions. Yet the judges believed they did not have the authority to rule on the president's power to order the eavesdropping, government sources said, and focused instead on protecting the integrity of the FISA process. It was an odd position for the presiding judges of the FISA court, the secret panel created in 1978 in response to a public outcry over warrantless domestic spying by J. Edgar Hoover's FBI. The court's appointees, chosen by then-Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, were generally veteran jurists with a pro-government bent, and their classified work is considered a powerful tool for catching spies and terrorists."
Perhaps this judge has been portrayed unfairly, as collaborating with the government. But more important, it seems to put a face-- THE face-- on the American who decided it was okay to spy on every other American. Regardless of her raising of concerns, she went ahead and, with her unique power, as head of the secretive FISA Court, made an even more secret decision to approve the worse spying in the history of America. In spite of evidence of abuses, that the 2006 WaPo article reported, she went ahead and approved further, more egregious and aggressive spying. It looks like she never said no, when asked. She should be called before congress and questioned. And she should be more worried about what she DID than what is said about her so far. There is no question that she did approve the horrific level of spying we now know the NSA engages in. The question is, how did any protector of the citizens-- the duty of every elected and appointed government official, ever allow a single person to make such an important decision-- and who decided to keep it secret? Because they violated their oath and should be punished to the full extent of the law. US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 02-07-2013 It is good to see the Washington Post being 'courageous' as Sir Humphrey would say. She looks very 'hygienic'. US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 02-07-2013 James Clapper is still lying to AmericaA smoking gun shows Director of National Intelligence James Clapper is a big liar -- and it's not the first timeBY DAVID SIROTA
James Clapper (Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque) "James Clapper Is Still Lying": That would be a more honest headline for yesterday's big Washington Post article about the director of national intelligence's letter to the U.S. Senate. Clapper, you may recall, unequivocally said "no, sir" in response to Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., asking him: "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Clapper's response was shown to be a lie by Snowden's disclosures, as well as by reports from the Guardian, the Washington Post, the Associated Press and Bloomberg News(among others). This is particularly significant, considering lying before Congress prevents the legislative branch from performing oversight and is therefore a felony. Upon Snowden's disclosures, Clapper initially explained his lie by insisting that his answer was carefully and deliberately calculated to be the "least untruthful" response to a question about classified information. Left unmentioned was the fact that he could have simply given the same truthful answer that Alberto Gonzales gave the committee in 2006. Now, though, Clapper is wholly changing his story, insisting that his answer wasn't a deliberate, carefully calibrated "least most untruthful" response; it was instead just a spur-of-the-moment accident based on an innocent misunderstanding. Indeed, as the Post reports, "Clapper sent a letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 21 saying that he had misunderstood the question he had been asked" and adding that "he thought Wyden was referring to NSA surveillance of e-mail traffic involving overseas targets, not the separate program in which the agency is authorized to collect records of Americans' phone calls." In his letter, Clapper says, "My response was clearly erroneous for which I apologize," and added that "mistakes will happen, and when I make one, I correct it." So Clapper first says it was a calculated move, and now he's saying it was just an innocuous misunderstanding and an inadvertent error. With that, the public and the Obama administration prosecutors who aggressively pursue perjurers are all supposed to now breathe a sigh of relief and chalk it all up to a forgivable screw-up. It's all just an innocent mistake, right? Wrong, because in this crime, as Clapper's changing story suggests, there remains a smoking gun. Notice this statement from Sen. Wyden about Snowden's disclosures a statement, mind you, that the Post didn't reference in its story yesterday (emphasis added): "One of the most important responsibilities a Senator has is oversight of the intelligence community. This job cannot be done responsibly if Senators aren't getting straight answers to direct questions. When NSA Director Alexander failed to clarify previous public statements about domestic surveillance, it was necessary to put the question to the Director of National Intelligence. So that he would be prepared to answer, I sent the question to Director Clapper's office a day in advance. After the hearing was over my staff and I gave his office a chance to amend his answer. So Clapper had a full day's notice of the specific and impossible to misunderstand question Wyden asked, and is nonetheless now claiming that in the heat of the moment he spontaneously misunderstood the question. In other words, he's not coming clean, as the Post story seems to imply. On the contrary, he's lying about his deliberate lie, which should only make a perjury prosecution that much easier, for it shows intent.The importance of such a perjury prosecution, of course, should not be lost on our constitutional law professor-turned-president. Out of all people, he has to understand that equal protection under the law means treating Clapper (and Alexander, who also lied to Congress) exactly the same way his administration treated pitcher Roger Clemens. Otherwise, the message from the government would be that lying to Congress about baseball is more of a felony than lying to Congress about Americans' Fourth Amendment rights. Such a message would declare that when it comes to brazen law-breaking, as long as you are personally connected to the president, you get protection rather than the prosecution you deserve. http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/this_man_is_still_lying_to_america/ US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 05-07-2013 NSA taught Snowden how to be a hacker. Quote:Résumé Shows Snowden Honed Hacking Skillshttp://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/05/us/resume-shows-snowden-honed-hacking-skills.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0 US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 05-07-2013 Jan Klimkowski Wrote:Meanwhile, the Germans are calling the latest revelation about GCHQ spying "catastrophic". German spy service plans 'more online surveillance'Jun 16, 2013Germany's foreign intelligence service plans a major expansion of Internet surveillance despite deep unease over revelations of US online spying, Der Spiegel news weekly reported on Sunday. Spiegel said that the BND planned a 100 million euro ($130 million) programme over the next five years to expand web monitoring with up to 100 new staff members on a "technical reconnaissance" team. The report came ahead of a state visit to Berlin by US President Barack Obama during which the German government has pledged to take up the controversy over the US phone and Internet surveillance programmes. Spiegel said the BND aimed to monitor international data traffic "as closely as possible", noting that it currently kept tabs on about five percent of emails, Internet calls and online chats while German law allowed up to 20 percent. Unlike the US National Security Agency (NSA), Germany's BND is not allowed to store the data but must filter it immediately. "Of course our intelligence services must have an Internet presence," Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich told Der Spiegel, without confirming the details of the report. The state must ensure "that we balance the loss of control over communication by criminals with new legal and technological means," he added. Under the so-called PRISM programme that was exposed this month, the NSA can issue directives to Internet firms such as Google and Facebook to gain access to emails, online chats, pictures, files and videos uploaded by foreign users. Germany, where sensitivity over government surveillance is particularly heightened due to widespread spying on citizens by communist East Germany's despised Stasi, said last week it was sending a list of questions to the Obama administration about the programme. The European Union has also expressed disquiet over the scheme and warned of "grave adverse consequences" to the rights of European citizens. Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-06-german-spy-online-surveillance.html#jCp US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 05-07-2013 And then there is France.... Quote:France 'runs vast electronic spying operation using NSA-style methods'http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/04/france-electronic-spying-operation-nsa US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Magda Hassan - 06-07-2013 Venezuela has offered asylum to Snowden. As has Nicaragua. Thank you Ambassador Eacho. US spy chief Clapper defends Prism and phone surveillance - Peter Lemkin - 06-07-2013 Magda Hassan Wrote:Venezuela has offered asylum to Snowden. As has Nicaragua. Thank you Ambassador Eacho. There is still a non-trivial matter of how to get him to either place, as the US has shown it will ask for planes to be forced to land for inspection and if Snowden is aboard, arrested...... all in contravention of international law. I think it will take a magician's trick to get him safely to someplace like Venezuela. Ditto Assange.....even if he wins a Parliamentary seat in Australia. The Empire has its enemies list and it plans to imprison, silence or kill those on it - by any means at its disposal - laws be damned. |