+- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora)
+-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: 911 (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: The first 9/11 sceptic into print. (/thread-4293.html)
Pages:
1
2
The first 9/11 sceptic into print. - Malcolm Pryce - 21-08-2010
I think Dave McGowan's 'Wag the Moondoggie' series is simply brilliant. Well-written, very witty and compelling. It makes a great accompaniment to Jack's Apollo photo analysis which is also excellent. Whether they went or not, I think there's no doubt they faked the photography. And why would they need to do that if they really went?
The first 9/11 sceptic into print. - Keith Millea - 22-08-2010
Malcolm Pryce Wrote:I think Dave McGowan's 'Wag the Moondoggie' series is simply brilliant. Well-written, very witty and compelling. It makes a great accompaniment to Jack's Apollo photo analysis which is also excellent. Whether they went or not, I think there's no doubt they faked the photography. And why would they need to do that if they really went?
Hey Malcolm thanks for the heads-up on "Wag the Moondoggie".I'm a little braindead from the length of the thing,but I just couldn't stop from reading it.I think it's worth adding the link here.
part 1
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html
The first 9/11 sceptic into print. - Peter Dawson - 23-08-2010
Jack White Wrote:Peter...check my website...
http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html
http://www.aulis.com/skeleton.htm
...and then get back to me.
Jack
The way I see it, whatever the truth is with the moon landings, they aren't the elephant in the living room while 9/11 truth is still unacknowledged by the larger population. 9/11 is just as important as the moon landings, and I'm far more confident that 9/11 was a staged job than I am about the moon landings. And JFK's assassination is second in importance after 9/11 truth.
The first 9/11 sceptic into print. - Jack White - 23-08-2010
Peter Dawson Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Peter...check my website...
http://www.aulis.com/jackstudies_index1.html
http://www.aulis.com/skeleton.htm
...and then get back to me.
Jack
The way I see it, whatever the truth is with the moon landings, they aren't the elephant in the living room while 9/11 truth is still unacknowledged by the larger population. 9/11 is just as important as the moon landings, and I'm far more confident that 9/11 was a staged job than I am about the moon landings. And JFK's assassination is second in importance after 9/11 truth.
You are correct. At this date, the only usefulness of the Apollo fakery
is that it provides a good case study in official deceit and coverup...the
malfeasance of Lyndon and Tricky Dick.
In importance...1, 911; 2. JFK; 3, Apollo.
Thanks.
Jack
The first 9/11 sceptic into print. - Malcolm Pryce - 23-08-2010
I wouldn’t disagree with that, but the moon hoax if ever accepted would, of course, blow 9/11 out of the water in terms of the ramifications. Imagine it! Not that there is even the slightest chance of it happening. It’s possible to engage many people on the 9/11 issue. We all know what happens if you question the moon landings. Even when that priceless piece of moon rock in the Dutch National Museum turned out to be a piece of wood last year nobody minded.