![]() |
|
Letting The Neocons Lead... - Printable Version +- Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora) +-- Forum: Deep Politics Forum (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Historical Events (https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: Letting The Neocons Lead... (/thread-13340.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Letting The Neocons Lead... - David Guyatt - 19-11-2014 Drew Phipps Wrote:I'm gonna take issue with your use of the term "moral weakness." Far as I can see, Obama has been one of the most "moral" presidents I've ever seen. Certainly he has a better track record on "morality" than Clinton and GW. I'm happy with moral weakness, Drew. He clearly doesn't agree with the neocon agenda (as far as I can see, anyway) and yet won't block it or fight it, but sits by while they commandeer his foreign policy. For me that's a moral weakness and a character flaw which informs me of how ethically weak he really is. As for the safest bet for Americans, I would argue that their best bet is to boycott all political parties and voting. Period. The whole system is a complete sham; a shadow play where the only citizens who have any clout or meaningful influence, are those with wealth and power - where their dollars work for them. For the rest of us our dollars are commandeered through the tax system and embezzled on a grand scale. Being in "public service" translates, for me, as willingly participating in a cloaked exercise in grand larceny. Taking part in elections - especially national elections, is simply placing a bet on a fixed roulette table and worse, plays into the belief that your vote ultimately matters. Your vote only matters (extremely limited even so) for that one second it takes to mark the ballot paper or press the button. After that you don't count at all until the next time a vote comes around. A curse on the houses of all political parties and the system as it is currently configured. |